One of my mentors, Jim Rohn, says that “You should leave a place better than what you have found it.”

With all the political debate going on and the mud slinging about who did what and who didn’t do what, it is very simple to see who would do the better job.

Simply go back to the communities that they served and see if the communities are better for them being there. This is the ultimate test!

It’s very easy to sit and blame the current administration for the problems that we face but the fact is three of the people who running for the highest offices in the United States are part of the problem.

Again to see if we are better off for them being there let’s examine the legislation that they had pass during their time in office. Let’s see if we as a country are better off for them being there.

Joe Biden - took office in January 1973. That is 35 years. Would it be safe to say the country is better off with his 35 years of meritorious service?

So if you don’t think the country is better for him serving us in the Senate for 35 years, than I guess he is not the answer.

Barack Obama - took office in January 2005. That is 3 years. I have heard on several media sources that the last three years have been the worst in our history. If that is the case than why hasn’t he done more to bring it to our attention. And if he is the candidate of change, why hasn’t been able to get things changed.

He was a community organizer in Chicago. He led an organization to register unregistered voters. I would like someone to write in to the blog and let me know if Chicago is a better place for Barack Obama being involved. The TV news hasn’t had any specials on the miracles that happened in Chicago because of him being there.

Is he the answer?

John McCain - took office in January 1983. He has been in Washington for 25 years. He was a war hero. Is the United States in better shape because of his being in Washington. Out of the three people mentioned so far, he is someone who is not afraid to vote against his party if he doesn’t believe in what is being voted on.

He also stands against earmarks, which is funding in a bill, that is completely unrelated to the bill itself.

Is he the answer?

Sarah Palin - elected Governor of Alaska in December 2006. She ran a Clean-Election Campaign. She overwhelmingly beat the other Republican candidate in the primaries. She then went on to beat the sitting Governor of Alaska by an 8% margin.

Was the State of Alaska looking for change. I would say by their voting they were.

She has a history of getting things done in her state. I encourage anyone to go and visit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin and check it out.

One of the greatest ways to see the future is look at the past. Is the country better off for these people already being part of the problem?

That is the question.

Here’s to Your LifetoSuccess,

John Clark

John, Your on the mark, man. Here's a Coffee to keep you posting!